Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom

TheDogWhisperer.biz

An Animal Vet's Assessment of NAIS




I think that the NAIS program for
small breeders/ ranchers farmers
and  homesteaders will be worse
than any disease. What ever
happened to our rights as
Americans to grow our own food
without government. I am more
afraid of the gov't programs,
especially NAIS, PAWS, Real ID,
and Codex, as well as being
controlled by our own
government rather than the
terrorists.

This is a redundant program as
there are already laws on the
books and the vets have found
all the  sources of diseases quite
readily in the past. And the best
way to control diseases from
entering our country is to secure
our ports and borders, not
penalize the American citizens.

I can see that this will be a
horribly expensive program and
many  people will not be able to
continue as they have in the past.
This will give control of our food
supply to the mega-multinational
agriculture companies and
this really petrifies me as their
records  are not sterling. If we
implement this plan we will be
falling into  the hands of the
World Trade Union and the UN.
I personally do not want to eat
anything these companies
produce or use anything they
 manufacture as it seems their
morals are that of tomcats or Ex.

Monsanto and Agent Orange,
GMO's, Round Up and many
more items they have produced
and gotten approved that is
hurting our country and the
world. Let's not lessen what
will be blamed for the E. coli
etc. infections of the
feedlot/slaughter house
origins.

There is no stipulation about
vaccinating or testing the herd
of animals in question when
a disease has been detected
or herds  surrounding the herd
where disease was found.
My brother told me of a  couple
that had a large herd of elk.
They brought in a bull from
Wyoming that tested positive
for chronic wasting disease.
The gov't killed off and buried
all the herd (only 3 animals
were positive) and the bill for
the killing was sent to the
owner of the premises and it
was a bill for $20,000.

I think this is wrong, but so is
monopoly and usery and our
gov't is letting big companies
get away with those too.

Another item that concerns me
about the program is the
unwarranted inspections.
Not only do I think this is
unamerican I have known goat
owners to have their herds
infected by government vets
doing the inspections.

I want to make sure their bodies,
clothes, boots, cars and
equipment do not contaminate
my premises and property,
from the inspectors failing to
use proper bio-hazard
precautions. Thus tracking their
animal diseases onto each and
every rural farm or premises
that they inspect. Passing the
very animal  disease they are
there to stop. So then every-
one's herd of animals, pets, and
livestock would then be killed
because of the inspector's
failure to take proper bio-hazard 
precautions for the disease
outbreak inspection being
conducted and l for one, do
not want a bad outcome
of killing all the animals
and livestock on my property
because of the negligence
of the inspector entering
my property unclean.

I have gone to great lengths
to avoid disease in my herd
and I would be extremely
unhappy if some government
"lacky" should bring one in.

There are other parts of the
program I disagree with but for
now I  will not go into them.
Please be assured the people
that have read  the Strategic
Plan and Standards are not
happy with the wording and
general construction of the plan.

It gives too much leeway to
the big producers and restricts
the small breeders/homesteaders
too much. There is no stipulation
for  RFID tag/microchip failure,
the 24 hr reporting of an animal
death,  birth or leaving the
premise for any reason is
overkill.

Plus, requiring your vet or
neighbor to report you
to the USDA for a loose
animal or tag not
functioning sounds to
me like Nazi Germany
under Hilter. So it will be
also with the Class C
Misdemeanor fines being
assessed to you for
non-compliance with the
USDA regulations of NAIS,
in which the fines are
$1000./day, per violation,
per animal, per day.

Please read the USDA's
programs and let me know
if I am not correct on my
interpretation.

Animal Vet. Doctor's
NAME DELETED  for
PRIVACY REASONS

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom.org



"We Have the Right to Bear "FARMS."




Animal Identification System is Exactly the "Wrong"
Answer!

by Dean A. Ayers

Do you know about the National Animal Identification
System (NAIS) that the government is working on
implementing?

NAIS is a system that the USDA is proposing to identify
all livestock in the United States and also identify all
premises (locations with any livestock or pets).

This includes all birds, sheep, cows, pigs, horses,
llamas and many other animals and birds, like chickens.
The NAIS regulations can also be easily amended by
the USDA to include any and all animals and pets of
any kind, to include your dog or cat, and caged birds
like parrots or cock-a-tiels.

The stated goal is to be able to have 48 hour trace
back of all meats from the consumer to the farm where
the animal originated in case of illness or contamination.
The actual goal appears to be total "control" of the food
chain by the government, all the way from farm
to fork.

1) They are including livestock sold directly from small
farms to the end consumer where there is already
100% track back in much less than 48 hours. If you buy
locally from the source you know exactly where
your food came from.

2) They are snaring homesteaders by including even
livestock you might keep for your own consumption.
The government is implementing huge "non-compliance"
fines if you don't report your backyard flock of chickens,
your summer feeder pig, your lawn mowing sheep, etc.
This will take away your right to raise your own source
of eggs, meat and wool.

3) They are including animals that are not in the food
supply such as pets like horses, llamas, etc that are not
in the food chain. Subsequently this could also include
dogs, cats, etc, by a mear "amendment" to the USDA
regulation of NAIS, due to an alleged "carrier" of
disease potential by dogs, cats. etc.

Under the plan every single animal must be identified.
Any births, deaths and movements on or off the farm
will be required to be logged and reported to the
government. If you take your sheep to a show you
will have to track their location and submit paperwork
to the government. If you go for a trail ride with your
horse you will have to report that to the government.
If your pig has piglets you'll have to report that and
then if some of those piglets die or you eat one
you'll have to report that.

Pretty soon after that the government is going to
want to charge a consumption tax every time you eat
one of your own animals. After all, unless you buy all
your food then you're not paying sales tax, you're not
helping the Gross Domestic Product grow, you're not
paying your share. You think I'm joking? You are
required by law to pay taxes on any barters you do.
It is only a tiny step from that law and NAIS to a tax
on every chicken, every egg, every pig, every sheep,
etc. Then they'll go for your tomatoes and carrots.
(No, I am definitely not paranoid enough.)

All this identification, tattooing, labeling, tagging,
micro-chipping, RFID equipment and paper work is
going to cost money. Who do you think is going to pay?
You! That's who. NAIS will increase the cost of food
both to those who raise it and for consumers at the
farmer's market and at the supermarket. This is going
to require more government bureaucracy to manage
which will eventually lead to more fees and taxes
collected by the government to manage a system
tracking your life and making it ever more expensive.

Under the plan the government requires you to track
the animal movements as well as your premise location
(your home) with GPS and address coordinates.
All animal locations and movements must be
logged and reported under penalty of confiscation
and fines.

Furthermore the USDA will not guarantee to keep
the information confidential because of the Freedom
of Information Act. This means that radical animal
activists and animal  rights groups (PETA, ELF, and the
ASPCA) or others can find out about your pet animals.
These FBI alleged terrorist groups have already
attacked farms and destroyed property killing people
and animals. Now they'll have even more data to use
figuring out who to target. Lovely. On the other
hand, if the government eliminates your access to
the Freedom of Information Act, then you have no
ability to "know" what ID or tracking  information
the government is keeping on you. It's a 
"double edged" sword, all against the citizen
with pets, livestock and animals - (that's you).

Will this give us any better security? No. Almost all
of the cases of food born illness and recalls are
caused by contamination at the slaughter house,
packing plant and further along the chain of supply.
Perhaps this sort of thing is a good idea on the large
scale producers, the factory farms, the big slaughter
houses. It is not needed in our back yards and
homesteads. It is not necessary for small farms
selling direct to the consumer or other end users.
It is certainly beyond reason for non-food pets.

Virtually all of the remaining cases of food born
illness like Mad Cow and the like are the product
of bad practices like feeding animals back to their
own species and over crowding. These are problems
that are not related to the small farms, the
homesteaders and the backyard flocks. NAIS
won't solve these problems. Furthermore,
Mad Cow, to take the government's favorite
scarecrow, is something that takes years to
decades to infect. A 48 hour trace back is going
to do diddley-squat.

At the very least NAIS should allow exemptions
for pets, homesteaders, backyard flocks and
small farms or rural homes who only maintain
"pets" or personal consumption livestock animals
than 48 hour track back and are not the threat.
The threat is big agri-businesses, "factory farms"
that lock millions of animals in cages and generate
ideal conditions for disease to run wild through
animals with suppressed immune systems and
antibiotics in their feed. These are the corporations
that grind up cows and feed them back to the cows.
They are the ones that routinely feed antibiotics to
their livestock producing new strains of drug
resistant super-germs. They are the ones
generating enormous mountains of waste
and pollution the taints the air and the water.
They are the problem. If they are so gung-ho
for NAIS then let them implement it for themselves.

NAIS will lead to more centralization of our food
supply and bigger government. The big corporations
that already control too much of our food supply will
control even more of it. More control over the
system of production by fewer corporations and
individuals is a threat to our nation. This is the last
thing we need. What we need is decentralized local
production to ensure the safety of our food supply.
If all our food comes from a few sources then it is in
great danger for everyone. If our food comes from
many small localized farms then we have
greater national food security.

I Say: "We the People, have a Right to
Bear "FARMS!"

NAIS is exactly the "wrong" answer.

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom.org
is fully "AGAINST" the NAIS
in every respect, regarding Pet Owners, and
non-commercial  individuals, or producers.
Additionally, the traditional farmer/producers
should "not" be forced to participate,
and pay for all the expenses of NAIS,
where as the agricultural corporations have a
huge financial advantage to pay for the NAIS
expenses of equipment, RFID chips, readers,etc.
Also the USDA has given the agri-biz corporations
an "unfair" advantage in NAIS, in that, the agri-biz
corporations, only have to maintain ONE ID TAG,
for an entire herd of livestock; the true example:
One TAG, for 1,000 agri-biz corporation cattle.
This is "unfair" and "intentional" regulation
planning for "profiteering" on the part
of the USDA doing this unfair manipulation tactic.

This USDA regulations of NAIS will also eliminate
our U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights protections
regarding your "private property" known in NAIS
as your "premises." This will mean the USDA, can
enter your premises (property) without a legal
search warrant, and "search and seize" your
property, animals, etc. if they are found to be
unregistered with NAIS, or in non-compliance
in reporting, tracking and ID tagging.

Welcome to the world of animal owners
becoming the new generation of "criminals."
Thanks to the USDA writing regulations and
self enforcing them like laws, all with your
50 state Congressional Body Members,
allowing this to occur. This will be the
End of Times, and the beginning of the
Mark of the Beast scenario. Next they
most likely will be RFID "Chipping" humans
for tracking as well. Paranoid? No!
When was the last time, government
intrusion into your life, and criminal
fines, fees, and confiscations, made you
feel all "fuzzy" inside?

NAIS is exactly the "wrong" answer!

NAIS Storm Troopers vs The Dog Property Law


This is interesting, but I am not being
funny here, if you read into what just
happened to  DANNY and  CINDI
HENSHAW, Gladstone, VA., with their
PET hogs (Cupid and Valentine)
being "assassinated" by the USDA
Agents with 12 shotgun blasts on
only two pet hogs, and other animals
being unduly "murdered" by the
"Storm Troopers" of the USDA
with  Shotgun "blood-sport" Agents
allegedly slapping each other's
hands as they "murdered" the pets
and animals of the Henshaws on their
own "private property!"

This, not to mention, the authorities
placed an "armed guard" on CINDI
HENSHAW, just so she could not
photograph or record the incident.
Be advised, NO testing of the
Henshaw hogs were done
"before" killing them. As well
as, no "independent" samples of hog
blood were allowed to be taken by
the Henshaws. The USDA Agents
were also observed transporting
all the dead or dieing hogs, in open
trailers, with blood pouring out
on the ground on and off property
with the alleged "diseased" hog
blood leaving blood trails,
all the way to incineration.

Not exactly a "Professional" job
of following bio-hazard procedures,
even though a VA. State Vet was
overseeing the incident. Good Job
"Storm-Troopers" Kill, Kill, Kill!

This Henshaw Massacre Incident lead
me to write the following Creed.

-THE USDA-NAIS STORM TROOPER
CREED-

The USDA-NAIS  “Storm Trooper”
Creed is almost the same as the;
“DOG PROPERTY LAW”

1. If I like it, it’s mine.

2. If it’s in my mouth, it’s mine.

3. If I can take it from you,
it’s mine.

4. If I had it a little while ago,
it’s mine.

5. If it’s mine, it must never
appear to be yours, in any
way.

6. If I’m chewing something up,
all the pieces are mine.

7. If it just looks like mine,
it’s mine.

8. If I saw it first, it’s mine.

9. If you are playing with
something and you drop it,
it automatically becomes mine.

10. If it’s broken; by the USDA- NAIS
“Storm Troopers,” a “downer,”
or diseased, it’s yours.

by Dean A. Ayers [Director]
Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom

ADDITIONALLY I SAY:

A Department of Agriculture (USDA)
NAIS Premise I.D. Inspector
(Alias: NAIS Storm Trooper,
also known as a "COW-COP")
stopped at a NAIS "VOLUNTARY"
Premise I.D. registered farm and
said to the old farmer, in an alleged
blunt and rude manner:

NAIS Inspector said:
"I'm here to inspect your NAIS
Premise I.D. registered farm."

The old farmer, who never talked
much, just said, "You'd better
not go out in that field."

The USDA - NAIS representative
(COW-COP), then got on his
high horse, and said in a
demanding tone,

COW-COP SAID: "I have the
authority of the U. S. Government
behind me! See this card,
I am allowed to go wherever I
wish on agricultural land, regarding
any NAIS issue or inspection
without a warrant or so much
as a reason."

So the old farmer went about his
chores, without even a reply to
the NAIS Storm Trooper, also
called a COW-COP.

In a few minutes, the ole farmer
heard "loud" screams and saw
the Department of Agriculture
COW-COP, running for his life,
headed for the fence. Close
behind, and gaining with every
step, was the farmer's prize bull,
nostrils flaring, madder than a
nest full of hornets.

The old farmer cupped his hands
to his mouth and yelled out,
"Show Him Your Card!
Show Him Your Card!"

Dean A. Ayers
Glenwood, Iowa

http://Animalid.biz/
Dogpressorg@aol.com
I Say: "Be there. For every animal owner."

RFID Chip Implants Are Linked to Animal Tumors



RFID Chip Implants Are Linked to Animal Tumors

(Animalid.biz) - When the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved implanting microchips in humans and already allowed the implantation of Micro Chips in pets and animals, the manufacturer said it would save lives and allow owners to find their pets when lost, as well as human use of letting doctors scan the tiny transponders to access patients' medical records. The FDA found "reasonable assurance" the device was safe, however, they failed to research the many studies already accomplished to prove a link of RFID chip implantation to cancer in animals.

Neither the RFID companies nor government regulators, nor mass media, publicly mentioned this: A series of veterinary and toxicology studies, dating to the mid-1990s, stated that chip implants had "induced" malignant tumors in some lab mice and rats.

"The transponders were the cause of the tumors," said Keith Johnson, a retired toxicologic pathologist, explaining in a phone interview the findings of a 1996 study he led at the Dow Chemical Co. in Midland, Mich.

Leading cancer specialists reviewed the research for The Associated Press and, while cautioning that animal test results do not necessarily apply to humans, said the findings troubled them. Some said they would not allow family members or their pets to receive RFID Chip implants, and all urged further research before the glass-encased transponders are widely implanted in people or pets.

Published in veterinary and toxicology journals between 1996 and 2006, the studies found that lab mice and rats injected with microchips sometimes developed subcutaneous "sarcomas" - malignant tumors, most of them encasing the implants.

- A 1998 study in Ridgefield, Conn., of 177 mice reported cancer incidence to be slightly higher than 10 percent - a result the researchers described as "surprising."

- A 2006 study in France detected tumors in 4.1 percent of 1,260 microchipped mice. This was one of six studies in which the scientists did not set out to find microchip-induced cancer but noticed the growths incidentally. They were testing compounds on behalf of chemical and pharmaceutical companies; but they ruled out the compounds as the tumors' cause. Because researchers only noted the most obvious tumors, the French study said, "These incidences may therefore slightly underestimate the true occurrence" of cancer.

- In 1997, a study in Germany found cancers in 1 percent of 4,279 chipped mice. The tumors "are clearly due to the implanted microchips," the authors wrote.

Caveats accompanied the findings. "Blind leaps from the detection of tumors to the prediction of human health risk should be avoided," one study cautioned. Also, because none of the studies had a control group of animals that did not get chips, the normal rate of tumors cannot be determined and compared to the rate with chips implanted.

Still, after reviewing the research, specialists at some pre-eminent cancer institutions said the findings raised red flags.

"There's no way in the world, having read this information, that I would have one of those chips implanted in my skin, or in one of my family members," said Dr. Robert Benezra, head of the Cancer Biology Genetics Program at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

Before microchips are implanted on a large scale in humans, he said, testing should be done on larger animals, such as dogs or monkeys. "I mean, these are bad diseases. They are life-threatening. And given the preliminary animal data, it looks to me that there's definitely cause for concern."

Dr. George Demetri, director of the Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, agreed. Even though the tumor incidences were "reasonably small," in his view, the research underscored "certainly real risks" in RFID implants.

In humans, sarcomas, which strike connective tissues, can range from the highly curable to "tumors that are incredibly aggressive and can kill people in three to six months," he said.

At the Jackson Laboratory in Maine, a leader in mouse genetics research and the initiation of cancer, Dr. Oded Foreman, a forensic pathologist, also reviewed the studies at the AP's request.

At first he was skeptical, suggesting that chemicals administered in some of the studies could have caused the cancers and skewed the results. But he took a different view after seeing that control mice, which received no chemicals, also developed the cancers. "That might be a little hint that something real is happening here," he said. He, too, recommended further study, using mice, dogs or non-human primates.

Dr. Cheryl London, a veterinarian oncologist at Ohio State University, noted: "It's much easier to cause cancer in mice than it is in people. So it may be that what you're seeing in mice represents an exaggerated phenomenon of what may occur in people."

Tens of thousands of dogs have been chipped, she said, and veterinary pathologists haven't reported outbreaks of related sarcomas in the area of the neck, where canine implants are often done. (Published reports detailing malignant tumors in two chipped dogs turned up in AP's four-month examination of research on chips and health. In one dog, the researchers said cancer appeared linked to the presence of the embedded chip; in the other, the cancer's cause was uncertain.)

Nonetheless, London saw a need for a 20-year study of chipped canines "to see if you have a biological effect." Dr. Chand Khanna, a veterinary oncologist at the National Cancer Institute, also backed such a study, saying current evidence "does suggest some reason to be concerned about tumor formations."

Meanwhile, the animal study findings should be disclosed to anyone considering a chip implant in pets or humans, the cancer specialists agreed.

To date, however, that hasn't happened.

 http://Animalid.biz/