Animals C.L.U.B.- FreedomTheDogWhisperer.biz | ||
An Animal Vet's Assessment of NAIS![]() I think that the NAIS program for small breeders/ ranchers farmers and homesteaders will be worse than any disease. What ever happened to our rights as Americans to grow our own food without government. I am more afraid of the gov't programs, especially NAIS, PAWS, Real ID, and Codex, as well as being controlled by our own government rather than the terrorists. This is a redundant program as there are already laws on the books and the vets have found all the sources of diseases quite readily in the past. And the best way to control diseases from entering our country is to secure our ports and borders, not penalize the American citizens. I can see that this will be a horribly expensive program and many people will not be able to continue as they have in the past. This will give control of our food supply to the mega-multinational agriculture companies and this really petrifies me as their records are not sterling. If we implement this plan we will be falling into the hands of the World Trade Union and the UN. I personally do not want to eat anything these companies produce or use anything they manufacture as it seems their morals are that of tomcats or Ex. Monsanto and Agent Orange, GMO's, Round Up and many more items they have produced and gotten approved that is hurting our country and the world. Let's not lessen what will be blamed for the E. coli etc. infections of the feedlot/slaughter house origins. There is no stipulation about vaccinating or testing the herd of animals in question when a disease has been detected or herds surrounding the herd where disease was found. My brother told me of a couple that had a large herd of elk. They brought in a bull from Wyoming that tested positive for chronic wasting disease. The gov't killed off and buried all the herd (only 3 animals were positive) and the bill for the killing was sent to the owner of the premises and it was a bill for $20,000. I think this is wrong, but so is monopoly and usery and our gov't is letting big companies get away with those too. Another item that concerns me about the program is the unwarranted inspections. Not only do I think this is unamerican I have known goat owners to have their herds infected by government vets doing the inspections. I want to make sure their bodies, clothes, boots, cars and equipment do not contaminate my premises and property, from the inspectors failing to use proper bio-hazard precautions. Thus tracking their animal diseases onto each and every rural farm or premises that they inspect. Passing the very animal disease they are there to stop. So then every- one's herd of animals, pets, and livestock would then be killed because of the inspector's failure to take proper bio-hazard precautions for the disease outbreak inspection being conducted and l for one, do not want a bad outcome of killing all the animals and livestock on my property because of the negligence of the inspector entering my property unclean. I have gone to great lengths to avoid disease in my herd and I would be extremely unhappy if some government "lacky" should bring one in. There are other parts of the program I disagree with but for now I will not go into them. Please be assured the people that have read the Strategic Plan and Standards are not happy with the wording and general construction of the plan. It gives too much leeway to the big producers and restricts the small breeders/homesteaders too much. There is no stipulation for RFID tag/microchip failure, the 24 hr reporting of an animal death, birth or leaving the premise for any reason is overkill. Plus, requiring your vet or neighbor to report you to the USDA for a loose animal or tag not functioning sounds to me like Nazi Germany under Hilter. So it will be also with the Class C Misdemeanor fines being assessed to you for non-compliance with the USDA regulations of NAIS, in which the fines are $1000./day, per violation, per animal, per day. Please read the USDA's programs and let me know if I am not correct on my interpretation. Animal Vet. Doctor's NAME DELETED for PRIVACY REASONS Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom.org |
"We Have the Right to Bear "FARMS."![]() Animal Identification System is Exactly the "Wrong" Answer! by Dean A. Ayers Do you know about the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) that the government is working on implementing? NAIS is a system that the USDA is proposing to identify all livestock in the United States and also identify all premises (locations with any livestock or pets). This includes all birds, sheep, cows, pigs, horses, llamas and many other animals and birds, like chickens. The NAIS regulations can also be easily amended by the USDA to include any and all animals and pets of any kind, to include your dog or cat, and caged birds like parrots or cock-a-tiels. The stated goal is to be able to have 48 hour trace back of all meats from the consumer to the farm where the animal originated in case of illness or contamination. The actual goal appears to be total "control" of the food chain by the government, all the way from farm to fork. 1) They are including livestock sold directly from small farms to the end consumer where there is already 100% track back in much less than 48 hours. If you buy locally from the source you know exactly where your food came from. 2) They are snaring homesteaders by including even livestock you might keep for your own consumption. The government is implementing huge "non-compliance" fines if you don't report your backyard flock of chickens, your summer feeder pig, your lawn mowing sheep, etc. This will take away your right to raise your own source of eggs, meat and wool. 3) They are including animals that are not in the food supply such as pets like horses, llamas, etc that are not in the food chain. Subsequently this could also include dogs, cats, etc, by a mear "amendment" to the USDA regulation of NAIS, due to an alleged "carrier" of disease potential by dogs, cats. etc. Under the plan every single animal must be identified. Any births, deaths and movements on or off the farm will be required to be logged and reported to the government. If you take your sheep to a show you will have to track their location and submit paperwork to the government. If you go for a trail ride with your horse you will have to report that to the government. If your pig has piglets you'll have to report that and then if some of those piglets die or you eat one you'll have to report that. Pretty soon after that the government is going to want to charge a consumption tax every time you eat one of your own animals. After all, unless you buy all your food then you're not paying sales tax, you're not helping the Gross Domestic Product grow, you're not paying your share. You think I'm joking? You are required by law to pay taxes on any barters you do. It is only a tiny step from that law and NAIS to a tax on every chicken, every egg, every pig, every sheep, etc. Then they'll go for your tomatoes and carrots. (No, I am definitely not paranoid enough.) All this identification, tattooing, labeling, tagging, micro-chipping, RFID equipment and paper work is going to cost money. Who do you think is going to pay? You! That's who. NAIS will increase the cost of food both to those who raise it and for consumers at the farmer's market and at the supermarket. This is going to require more government bureaucracy to manage which will eventually lead to more fees and taxes collected by the government to manage a system tracking your life and making it ever more expensive. Under the plan the government requires you to track the animal movements as well as your premise location (your home) with GPS and address coordinates. All animal locations and movements must be logged and reported under penalty of confiscation and fines. Furthermore the USDA will not guarantee to keep the information confidential because of the Freedom of Information Act. This means that radical animal activists and animal rights groups (PETA, ELF, and the ASPCA) or others can find out about your pet animals. These FBI alleged terrorist groups have already attacked farms and destroyed property killing people and animals. Now they'll have even more data to use figuring out who to target. Lovely. On the other hand, if the government eliminates your access to the Freedom of Information Act, then you have no ability to "know" what ID or tracking information the government is keeping on you. It's a "double edged" sword, all against the citizen with pets, livestock and animals - (that's you). Will this give us any better security? No. Almost all of the cases of food born illness and recalls are caused by contamination at the slaughter house, packing plant and further along the chain of supply. Perhaps this sort of thing is a good idea on the large scale producers, the factory farms, the big slaughter houses. It is not needed in our back yards and homesteads. It is not necessary for small farms selling direct to the consumer or other end users. It is certainly beyond reason for non-food pets. Virtually all of the remaining cases of food born illness like Mad Cow and the like are the product of bad practices like feeding animals back to their own species and over crowding. These are problems that are not related to the small farms, the homesteaders and the backyard flocks. NAIS won't solve these problems. Furthermore, Mad Cow, to take the government's favorite scarecrow, is something that takes years to decades to infect. A 48 hour trace back is going to do diddley-squat. At the very least NAIS should allow exemptions for pets, homesteaders, backyard flocks and small farms or rural homes who only maintain "pets" or personal consumption livestock animals than 48 hour track back and are not the threat. The threat is big agri-businesses, "factory farms" that lock millions of animals in cages and generate ideal conditions for disease to run wild through animals with suppressed immune systems and antibiotics in their feed. These are the corporations that grind up cows and feed them back to the cows. They are the ones that routinely feed antibiotics to their livestock producing new strains of drug resistant super-germs. They are the ones generating enormous mountains of waste and pollution the taints the air and the water. They are the problem. If they are so gung-ho for NAIS then let them implement it for themselves. NAIS will lead to more centralization of our food supply and bigger government. The big corporations that already control too much of our food supply will control even more of it. More control over the system of production by fewer corporations and individuals is a threat to our nation. This is the last thing we need. What we need is decentralized local production to ensure the safety of our food supply. If all our food comes from a few sources then it is in great danger for everyone. If our food comes from many small localized farms then we have greater national food security. I Say: "We the People, have a Right to Bear "FARMS!" NAIS is exactly the "wrong" answer. Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom.org is fully "AGAINST" the NAIS in every respect, regarding Pet Owners, and non-commercial individuals, or producers. Additionally, the traditional farmer/producers should "not" be forced to participate, and pay for all the expenses of NAIS, where as the agricultural corporations have a huge financial advantage to pay for the NAIS expenses of equipment, RFID chips, readers,etc. Also the USDA has given the agri-biz corporations an "unfair" advantage in NAIS, in that, the agri-biz corporations, only have to maintain ONE ID TAG, for an entire herd of livestock; the true example: One TAG, for 1,000 agri-biz corporation cattle. This is "unfair" and "intentional" regulation planning for "profiteering" on the part of the USDA doing this unfair manipulation tactic. This USDA regulations of NAIS will also eliminate our U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights protections regarding your "private property" known in NAIS as your "premises." This will mean the USDA, can enter your premises (property) without a legal search warrant, and "search and seize" your property, animals, etc. if they are found to be unregistered with NAIS, or in non-compliance in reporting, tracking and ID tagging. Welcome to the world of animal owners becoming the new generation of "criminals." Thanks to the USDA writing regulations and self enforcing them like laws, all with your 50 state Congressional Body Members, allowing this to occur. This will be the End of Times, and the beginning of the Mark of the Beast scenario. Next they most likely will be RFID "Chipping" humans for tracking as well. Paranoid? No! When was the last time, government intrusion into your life, and criminal fines, fees, and confiscations, made you feel all "fuzzy" inside? NAIS is exactly the "wrong" answer! |
Navigation Services |
NAIS Storm Troopers vs The Dog Property Law![]() This is interesting, but I am not being funny here, if you read into what just happened to DANNY and CINDI HENSHAW, Gladstone, VA., with their PET hogs (Cupid and Valentine) being "assassinated" by the USDA Agents with 12 shotgun blasts on only two pet hogs, and other animals being unduly "murdered" by the "Storm Troopers" of the USDA with Shotgun "blood-sport" Agents allegedly slapping each other's hands as they "murdered" the pets and animals of the Henshaws on their own "private property!" This, not to mention, the authorities placed an "armed guard" on CINDI HENSHAW, just so she could not photograph or record the incident. Be advised, NO testing of the Henshaw hogs were done "before" killing them. As well as, no "independent" samples of hog blood were allowed to be taken by the Henshaws. The USDA Agents were also observed transporting all the dead or dieing hogs, in open trailers, with blood pouring out on the ground on and off property with the alleged "diseased" hog blood leaving blood trails, all the way to incineration. Not exactly a "Professional" job of following bio-hazard procedures, even though a VA. State Vet was overseeing the incident. Good Job "Storm-Troopers" Kill, Kill, Kill! This Henshaw Massacre Incident lead me to write the following Creed. -THE USDA-NAIS STORM TROOPER CREED- The USDA-NAIS “Storm Trooper” Creed is almost the same as the; “DOG PROPERTY LAW” 1. If I like it, it’s mine. 2. If it’s in my mouth, it’s mine. 3. If I can take it from you, it’s mine. 4. If I had it a little while ago, it’s mine. 5. If it’s mine, it must never appear to be yours, in any way. 6. If I’m chewing something up, all the pieces are mine. 7. If it just looks like mine, it’s mine. 8. If I saw it first, it’s mine. 9. If you are playing with something and you drop it, it automatically becomes mine. 10. If it’s broken; by the USDA- NAIS “Storm Troopers,” a “downer,” or diseased, it’s yours. by Dean A. Ayers [Director] Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom ADDITIONALLY I SAY: A Department of Agriculture (USDA) NAIS Premise I.D. Inspector (Alias: NAIS Storm Trooper, also known as a "COW-COP") stopped at a NAIS "VOLUNTARY" Premise I.D. registered farm and said to the old farmer, in an alleged blunt and rude manner: NAIS Inspector said: "I'm here to inspect your NAIS Premise I.D. registered farm." The old farmer, who never talked much, just said, "You'd better not go out in that field." The USDA - NAIS representative (COW-COP), then got on his high horse, and said in a demanding tone, COW-COP SAID: "I have the authority of the U. S. Government behind me! See this card, I am allowed to go wherever I wish on agricultural land, regarding any NAIS issue or inspection without a warrant or so much as a reason." So the old farmer went about his chores, without even a reply to the NAIS Storm Trooper, also called a COW-COP. In a few minutes, the ole farmer heard "loud" screams and saw the Department of Agriculture COW-COP, running for his life, headed for the fence. Close behind, and gaining with every step, was the farmer's prize bull, nostrils flaring, madder than a nest full of hornets. The old farmer cupped his hands to his mouth and yelled out, "Show Him Your Card! Show Him Your Card!" Dean A. Ayers Glenwood, Iowa http://Animalid.biz/ Dogpressorg@aol.com I Say: "Be there. For every animal owner." RFID Chip Implants Are Linked to Animal Tumors![]() RFID Chip Implants Are Linked to Animal Tumors (Animalid.biz) - When the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved implanting microchips in humans and already allowed the implantation of Micro Chips in pets and animals, the manufacturer said it would save lives and allow owners to find their pets when lost, as well as human use of letting doctors scan the tiny transponders to access patients' medical records. The FDA found "reasonable assurance" the device was safe, however, they failed to research the many studies already accomplished to prove a link of RFID chip implantation to cancer in animals. Neither the RFID companies nor government regulators, nor mass media, publicly mentioned this: A series of veterinary and toxicology studies, dating to the mid-1990s, stated that chip implants had "induced" malignant tumors in some lab mice and rats. "The transponders were the cause of the tumors," said Keith Johnson, a retired toxicologic pathologist, explaining in a phone interview the findings of a 1996 study he led at the Dow Chemical Co. in Midland, Mich. Leading cancer specialists reviewed the research for The Associated Press and, while cautioning that animal test results do not necessarily apply to humans, said the findings troubled them. Some said they would not allow family members or their pets to receive RFID Chip implants, and all urged further research before the glass-encased transponders are widely implanted in people or pets. Published in veterinary and toxicology journals between 1996 and 2006, the studies found that lab mice and rats injected with microchips sometimes developed subcutaneous "sarcomas" - malignant tumors, most of them encasing the implants. - A 1998 study in Ridgefield, Conn., of 177 mice reported cancer incidence to be slightly higher than 10 percent - a result the researchers described as "surprising." - A 2006 study in France detected tumors in 4.1 percent of 1,260 microchipped mice. This was one of six studies in which the scientists did not set out to find microchip-induced cancer but noticed the growths incidentally. They were testing compounds on behalf of chemical and pharmaceutical companies; but they ruled out the compounds as the tumors' cause. Because researchers only noted the most obvious tumors, the French study said, "These incidences may therefore slightly underestimate the true occurrence" of cancer. - In 1997, a study in Germany found cancers in 1 percent of 4,279 chipped mice. The tumors "are clearly due to the implanted microchips," the authors wrote. Caveats accompanied the findings. "Blind leaps from the detection of tumors to the prediction of human health risk should be avoided," one study cautioned. Also, because none of the studies had a control group of animals that did not get chips, the normal rate of tumors cannot be determined and compared to the rate with chips implanted. Still, after reviewing the research, specialists at some pre-eminent cancer institutions said the findings raised red flags. "There's no way in the world, having read this information, that I would have one of those chips implanted in my skin, or in one of my family members," said Dr. Robert Benezra, head of the Cancer Biology Genetics Program at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York. Before microchips are implanted on a large scale in humans, he said, testing should be done on larger animals, such as dogs or monkeys. "I mean, these are bad diseases. They are life-threatening. And given the preliminary animal data, it looks to me that there's definitely cause for concern." Dr. George Demetri, director of the Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, agreed. Even though the tumor incidences were "reasonably small," in his view, the research underscored "certainly real risks" in RFID implants. In humans, sarcomas, which strike connective tissues, can range from the highly curable to "tumors that are incredibly aggressive and can kill people in three to six months," he said. At the Jackson Laboratory in Maine, a leader in mouse genetics research and the initiation of cancer, Dr. Oded Foreman, a forensic pathologist, also reviewed the studies at the AP's request. At first he was skeptical, suggesting that chemicals administered in some of the studies could have caused the cancers and skewed the results. But he took a different view after seeing that control mice, which received no chemicals, also developed the cancers. "That might be a little hint that something real is happening here," he said. He, too, recommended further study, using mice, dogs or non-human primates. Dr. Cheryl London, a veterinarian oncologist at Ohio State University, noted: "It's much easier to cause cancer in mice than it is in people. So it may be that what you're seeing in mice represents an exaggerated phenomenon of what may occur in people." Tens of thousands of dogs have been chipped, she said, and veterinary pathologists haven't reported outbreaks of related sarcomas in the area of the neck, where canine implants are often done. (Published reports detailing malignant tumors in two chipped dogs turned up in AP's four-month examination of research on chips and health. In one dog, the researchers said cancer appeared linked to the presence of the embedded chip; in the other, the cancer's cause was uncertain.) Nonetheless, London saw a need for a 20-year study of chipped canines "to see if you have a biological effect." Dr. Chand Khanna, a veterinary oncologist at the National Cancer Institute, also backed such a study, saying current evidence "does suggest some reason to be concerned about tumor formations." Meanwhile, the animal study findings should be disclosed to anyone considering a chip implant in pets or humans, the cancer specialists agreed. To date, however, that hasn't happened. http://Animalid.biz/ |